Bhutan vs Tanzania: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Bhutan
185,175 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
175,195 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
141st
Tanzania rank
143rd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Bhutan
  • Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020062023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 185,175 current international $ per square kilometre against 175,195 current international $ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 9,980 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 141st and Tanzania ranks 143rd of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 15,205 current international $ per square kilometre 14,442 current international $ per square kilometre 763.15 current international $ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 28,285 current international $ per square kilometre 37,370 current international $ per square kilometre 9,085 current international $ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 82,913 current international $ per square kilometre 91,070 current international $ per square kilometre 8,157 current international $ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 151,606 current international $ per square kilometre 154,708 current international $ per square kilometre 3,102 current international $ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Bhutan or Tanzania?
Bhutan, at 185,175 current international $ per square kilometre against 175,195 current international $ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Bhutan and Tanzania?
9,980 current international $ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Tanzania rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Bhutan ranks 141st and Tanzania ranks 143rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Tanzania: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/bhutan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/bhutan/tanzania/">Bhutan vs Tanzania: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.