Belgium vs South Korea: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Belgium
13.55 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea
13.96 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
11th
South Korea rank
10th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Belgium
  • South Korea
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M15.0M199020062023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 13.96 million current international $ per square kilometre against 13.55 million current international $ per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 411,200 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 11th and South Korea ranks 10th of 179 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium South Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 5.57 million current international $ per square kilometre 6.13 million current international $ per square kilometre 560,750 current international $ per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 8.32 million current international $ per square kilometre 9.22 million current international $ per square kilometre 891,192 current international $ per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 11.42 million current international $ per square kilometre 12.10 million current international $ per square kilometre 683,135 current international $ per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Belgium or South Korea?
South Korea, at 13.96 million current international $ per square kilometre against 13.55 million current international $ per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Belgium and South Korea?
411,200 current international $ per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Korea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and South Korea rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Belgium ranks 11th and South Korea ranks 10th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs South Korea: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/belgium/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/belgium/korea-rep/">Belgium vs South Korea: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.