Belarus vs Gambia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Belarus
727,903 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
747,619 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
92nd
Gambia rank
91st

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Belarus
  • Gambia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 747,619 current international $ per square kilometre against 727,903 current international $ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 19,716 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 92nd and Gambia ranks 91st of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 72,687 current international $ per square kilometre 67,265 current international $ per square kilometre 5,422 current international $ per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 201,213 current international $ per square kilometre 219,881 current international $ per square kilometre 18,668 current international $ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 453,465 current international $ per square kilometre 380,103 current international $ per square kilometre 73,362 current international $ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 632,754 current international $ per square kilometre 645,150 current international $ per square kilometre 12,396 current international $ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Belarus or Gambia?
Gambia, at 747,619 current international $ per square kilometre against 727,903 current international $ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Belarus and Gambia?
19,716 current international $ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Gambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Gambia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Belarus ranks 92nd and Gambia ranks 91st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Gambia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/belarus/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/belarus/gambia-the/">Belarus vs Gambia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.