Azerbaijan vs China: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Azerbaijan
1.51 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
China
1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
62nd
China rank
63rd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • China
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199020062023

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 1.51 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 17,020 current international $ per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 62nd and China ranks 63rd of 179 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan China Difference Ahead
1990s 138,553 current international $ per square kilometre 83,607 current international $ per square kilometre 54,946 current international $ per square kilometre Azerbaijan
2000s 351,966 current international $ per square kilometre 235,422 current international $ per square kilometre 116,543 current international $ per square kilometre Azerbaijan
2010s 955,667 current international $ per square kilometre 721,546 current international $ per square kilometre 234,121 current international $ per square kilometre Azerbaijan
2020s 1.31 million current international $ per square kilometre 1.26 million current international $ per square kilometre 53,228 current international $ per square kilometre Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Azerbaijan or China?
Azerbaijan, at 1.51 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Azerbaijan and China?
17,020 current international $ per square kilometre, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and China rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Azerbaijan ranks 62nd and China ranks 63rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs China: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/azerbaijan/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/azerbaijan/china/">Azerbaijan vs China: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.