Angola vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant)

Angola
132,557 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
126,005 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
142nd
Kazakhstan rank
144th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant) over time

  • Angola
  • Kazakhstan
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199220072023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 132,557 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 126,005 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 6,552 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 142nd and Kazakhstan ranks 144th of 167 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 43,427 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 47,806 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 4,380 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 76,412 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 91,665 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 15,253 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 111,879 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 115,536 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 3,658 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant), Angola or Kazakhstan?
Angola, at 132,557 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 126,005 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant) between Angola and Kazakhstan?
6,552 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Kazakhstan?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Angola and Kazakhstan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant)?
Angola ranks 142nd and Kazakhstan ranks 144th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-3/angola/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-3/angola/kazakhstan/">Angola vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,087 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.