New Caledonia vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)

New Caledonia
330,849 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
387,906 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
96th
Rwanda rank
93rd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Rwanda
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 387,906 current US$ per square kilometre against 330,849 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 57,057 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Rwanda ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 96th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 188 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 29,669 current US$ per square kilometre 40,747 current US$ per square kilometre 11,077 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 127,242 current US$ per square kilometre 62,103 current US$ per square kilometre 65,139 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 211,386 current US$ per square kilometre 93,621 current US$ per square kilometre 117,765 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 335,442 current US$ per square kilometre 256,807 current US$ per square kilometre 78,636 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 334,104 current US$ per square kilometre 339,242 current US$ per square kilometre 5,138 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$), New Caledonia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 387,906 current US$ per square kilometre against 330,849 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$) between New Caledonia and Rwanda?
57,057 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Rwanda?
33 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Rwanda rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$)?
New Caledonia ranks 96th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/rwanda/">New Caledonia vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 10,432 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.