Central African Republic vs Greenland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)

Central African Republic
3,994 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
2,641 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
185th
Greenland rank
187th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Greenland
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 3,994 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,641 current US$ per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 1,353 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.5 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Greenland ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 185th and Greenland ranks 187th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Greenland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Greenland Difference Ahead
2000s 2,248 current US$ per square kilometre 2,302 current US$ per square kilometre 54.07 current US$ per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 2,865 current US$ per square kilometre 2,656 current US$ per square kilometre 209.16 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 3,719 current US$ per square kilometre 2,615 current US$ per square kilometre 1,103 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$), Central African Republic or Greenland?
Central African Republic, at 3,994 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,641 current US$ per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$) between Central African Republic and Greenland?
1,353 current US$ per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Greenland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Greenland rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$)?
Central African Republic ranks 185th and Greenland ranks 187th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Greenland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/">Central African Republic vs Greenland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 10,432 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.