Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)

Burundi
77,344 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
77,952 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
146th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) over time

  • Burundi
  • Zimbabwe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 77,952 current US$ per square kilometre against 77,344 current US$ per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 608 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 6,935 current US$ per square kilometre 2,477 current US$ per square kilometre 4,459 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 13,747 current US$ per square kilometre 6,419 current US$ per square kilometre 7,327 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 36,277 current US$ per square kilometre 12,030 current US$ per square kilometre 24,247 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 33,787 current US$ per square kilometre 12,700 current US$ per square kilometre 21,087 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 40,136 current US$ per square kilometre 14,040 current US$ per square kilometre 26,097 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 80,165 current US$ per square kilometre 52,579 current US$ per square kilometre 27,586 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 82,958 current US$ per square kilometre 83,016 current US$ per square kilometre 58.38 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$), Burundi or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 77,952 current US$ per square kilometre against 77,344 current US$ per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$) between Burundi and Zimbabwe?
608 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Zimbabwe rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$)?
Burundi ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/zimbabwe/">Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 10,432 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.