Brazil vs Iceland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)

Brazil
164,959 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
153,033 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
121st
Iceland rank
124th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) over time

  • Brazil
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 164,959 current US$ per square kilometre against 153,033 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 11,926 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 121st and Iceland ranks 124th of 188 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 9,992 current US$ per square kilometre 8,636 current US$ per square kilometre 1,356 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 21,083 current US$ per square kilometre 23,844 current US$ per square kilometre 2,762 current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 44,730 current US$ per square kilometre 42,052 current US$ per square kilometre 2,678 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 71,036 current US$ per square kilometre 76,870 current US$ per square kilometre 5,834 current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 162,594 current US$ per square kilometre 97,247 current US$ per square kilometre 65,347 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 136,604 current US$ per square kilometre 135,587 current US$ per square kilometre 1,017 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$), Brazil or Iceland?
Brazil, at 164,959 current US$ per square kilometre against 153,033 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$) between Brazil and Iceland?
11,926 current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Iceland rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$)?
Brazil ranks 121st and Iceland ranks 124th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Iceland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iceland/">Brazil vs Iceland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 10,432 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.