Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
375,689 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
330,849 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
94th
New Caledonia rank
96th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Caledonia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k198120022023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 375,689 current US$ per square kilometre against 330,849 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 44,840 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 94th and New Caledonia ranks 96th of 188 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 203,158 current US$ per square kilometre 211,386 current US$ per square kilometre 8,228 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 291,474 current US$ per square kilometre 335,442 current US$ per square kilometre 43,969 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 329,913 current US$ per square kilometre 334,104 current US$ per square kilometre 4,191 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Caledonia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 375,689 current US$ per square kilometre against 330,849 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
44,840 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 94th and New Caledonia ranks 96th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 10,432 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.