New Zealand vs Panama: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

New Zealand
511,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
485,628 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
68th
Panama rank
71st

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Panama
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 511,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 485,628 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 26,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 68th and Panama ranks 71st of 170 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 223,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 147,537 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 76,456 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 285,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 222,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 63,463 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 388,906 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 368,783 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,123 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 492,802 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 452,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), New Zealand or Panama?
New Zealand, at 511,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 485,628 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between New Zealand and Panama?
26,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Panama?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Panama rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
New Zealand ranks 68th and Panama ranks 71st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Panama: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/panama/">New Zealand vs Panama: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.