Mexico vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Mexico
489,035 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
477,981 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
70th
Pakistan rank
72nd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Mexico
  • Pakistan
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 489,035 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 477,981 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 11,054 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 38 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 70th and Pakistan ranks 72nd of 170 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Pakistan Difference Ahead
1980s 198,313 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 103,992 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 94,321 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 253,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 143,388 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 110,598 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 356,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 217,626 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 139,106 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 423,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 323,151 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 100,291 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 454,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 446,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,600 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Mexico or Pakistan?
Mexico, at 489,035 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 477,981 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Mexico and Pakistan?
11,054 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Pakistan?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Pakistan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Mexico ranks 70th and Pakistan ranks 72nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/pakistan/">Mexico vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.