Lithuania vs Thailand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Lithuania
493,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
526,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
69th
Thailand rank
67th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Lithuania
  • Thailand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 526,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 493,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 33,327 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Thailand ahead.

Lithuania ranks 69th and Thailand ranks 67th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Thailand Difference Ahead
1990s 188,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 225,640 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,726 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 315,439 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 298,152 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,286 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 399,167 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 404,481 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,314 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 479,982 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 486,355 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,373 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Lithuania or Thailand?
Thailand, at 526,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 493,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Lithuania and Thailand?
33,327 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Thailand?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Thailand rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Lithuania ranks 69th and Thailand ranks 67th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Thailand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/thailand/">Lithuania vs Thailand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.