Lithuania vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Lithuania
493,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
511,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
69th
New Zealand rank
68th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Lithuania
  • New Zealand
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 511,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 493,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 18,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was New Zealand ahead.

Lithuania ranks 69th and New Zealand ranks 68th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 188,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 220,086 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 315,439 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 285,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 399,167 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 388,906 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 479,982 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 492,802 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Lithuania or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 511,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 493,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Lithuania and New Zealand?
18,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Zealand?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and New Zealand rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Lithuania ranks 69th and New Zealand ranks 68th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/new-zealand/">Lithuania vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.