IDA only vs Portugal: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

IDA only
50,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
1.66 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only rank
38th
Portugal rank
36th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • IDA only
  • Portugal
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197019962023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 1.66 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 50,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 32.7 times IDA only's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

IDA only ranks 38th and Portugal ranks 36th of 42 groups.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Portugal Difference Ahead
1990s 21,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 30,053 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 39,785 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 48,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.57 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), IDA only or Portugal?
Portugal, at 1.66 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 50,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between IDA only and Portugal?
1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Portugal?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do IDA only and Portugal rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
IDA only ranks 38th and Portugal ranks 36th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Portugal: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/portugal/">IDA only vs Portugal: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.