Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Guinea-Bissau
46,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
48,517 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
144th
Kazakhstan rank
142nd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Kazakhstan
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 48,517 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 46,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2,256 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 144th and Kazakhstan ranks 142nd of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 21,061 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,975 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,086 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 22,537 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,041 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,496 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 30,470 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35,295 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 43,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 44,486 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,003 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Guinea-Bissau or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 48,517 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 46,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
2,256 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 144th and Kazakhstan ranks 142nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/kazakhstan/">Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.