Denmark vs IBRD only: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Denmark
3.98 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
265,792 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
22nd
IBRD only rank
19th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Denmark
  • IBRD only
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196619942023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 3.98 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 265,792 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 3.71 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 15.0 times IBRD only's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 22nd and IBRD only ranks 19th of 170 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark IBRD only Difference Ahead
1990s 2.88 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 72,437 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.81 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 3.25 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 104,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 3.63 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 184,961 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 4.04 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 243,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Denmark or IBRD only?
Denmark, at 3.98 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 265,792 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Denmark and IBRD only?
3.71 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IBRD only?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Denmark and IBRD only rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Denmark ranks 22nd and IBRD only ranks 19th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs IBRD only: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ibrd-only/">Denmark vs IBRD only: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.