Czechia vs Slovenia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Czechia
1.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
1.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
42nd
Slovenia rank
40th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Czechia
  • Slovenia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199220072023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 1.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 132,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovenia ahead.

Czechia ranks 42nd and Slovenia ranks 40th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 754,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 789,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 34,886 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 973,753 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 34,226 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 1.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,902 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 1.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,018 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Czechia or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 1.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Czechia and Slovenia?
132,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Slovenia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Slovenia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Czechia ranks 42nd and Slovenia ranks 40th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Slovenia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/slovenia/">Czechia vs Slovenia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.