Cuba vs Mexico: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Cuba
469,324 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
489,035 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
73rd
Mexico rank
70th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Cuba
  • Mexico
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 489,035 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 469,324 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 19,711 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 73rd and Mexico ranks 70th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Mexico in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Mexico Difference Ahead
1970s 174,456 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 134,197 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,259 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 288,038 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 195,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,399 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 234,077 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 253,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,909 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 298,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 356,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,892 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 443,332 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 423,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 457,388 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 454,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,545 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Cuba or Mexico?
Mexico, at 489,035 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 469,324 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Cuba and Mexico?
19,711 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mexico?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Mexico rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Cuba ranks 73rd and Mexico ranks 70th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Mexico: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/mexico/">Cuba vs Mexico: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.