Botswana vs Namibia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Botswana
14,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
12,128 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
160th
Namibia rank
163rd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
05.0k10.0k15.0k197519992023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 14,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 12,128 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 2,044 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.

Botswana ranks 160th and Namibia ranks 163rd of 170 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 1,667 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,659 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 991.38 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 3,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,913 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 801.75 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 5,615 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,637 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 978.13 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 10,601 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,733 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,868 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 13,332 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,839 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Botswana or Namibia?
Botswana, at 14,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 12,128 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Botswana and Namibia?
2,044 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Botswana ranks 160th and Namibia ranks 163rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Namibia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/namibia/">Botswana vs Namibia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.