Botswana vs Congo: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Botswana
14,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
14,749 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
160th
Congo rank
159th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 14,749 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 577 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Congo ahead.

Botswana ranks 160th and Congo ranks 159th of 170 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 1,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,288 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,087 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 1,667 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,176 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 3,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,053 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 5,615 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,053 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,438 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 10,601 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,138 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,536 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 13,332 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 220.12 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Botswana or Congo?
Congo, at 14,749 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Botswana and Congo?
577 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Botswana ranks 160th and Congo ranks 159th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.