Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Samoa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
305,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
260,312 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
89th
Samoa rank
92nd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Samoa
0100.0k200.0k300.0k200020112023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 305,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 260,312 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 45,374 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Samoa's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 89th and Samoa ranks 92nd of 170 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 255,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 195,657 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 59,847 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 263,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 206,110 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,809 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 289,133 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 251,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,494 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Samoa?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 305,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 260,312 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Samoa?
45,374 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Samoa?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Samoa rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 89th and Samoa ranks 92nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Samoa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/samoa/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Samoa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.