Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
305,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
287,867 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
89th
Ecuador rank
91st

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ecuador
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 305,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 287,867 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 17,819 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 89th and Ecuador ranks 91st of 170 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 224,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 163,656 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 60,851 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 263,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 237,772 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,148 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 289,133 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 265,886 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 305,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 287,867 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
17,819 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 89th and Ecuador ranks 91st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.