Belarus vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Belarus
188,519 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
199,376 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
106th
South Africa rank
104th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Belarus
  • South Africa
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 199,376 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 188,519 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 10,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 106th and South Africa ranks 104th of 170 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 31,965 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 94,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 71,120 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 132,938 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 61,818 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 142,683 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 179,882 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,199 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 176,213 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 193,732 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,519 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Belarus or South Africa?
South Africa, at 199,376 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 188,519 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Belarus and South Africa?
10,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Belarus ranks 106th and South Africa ranks 104th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/south-africa/">Belarus vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.