Argentina vs Cambodia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Argentina
144,344 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia
130,278 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
114th
Cambodia rank
117th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Argentina
  • Cambodia
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k199320082023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 144,344 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 130,278 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 14,066 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 114th and Cambodia ranks 117th of 170 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Cambodia Difference Ahead
1990s 83,988 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,859 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 56,129 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 95,005 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49,128 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 45,877 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 139,988 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 99,111 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,877 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 134,297 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 123,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,646 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Argentina or Cambodia?
Argentina, at 144,344 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 130,278 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Argentina and Cambodia?
14,066 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cambodia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Cambodia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Argentina ranks 114th and Cambodia ranks 117th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Cambodia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/cambodia/">Argentina vs Cambodia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.