Finland vs Serbia: HICP - Processed food including alcohol and excluding tobacco
Finland
2
in 2025
Serbia
2.2
in 2015
Finland rank
28th
Serbia rank
26th
HICP - Processed food including alcohol and excluding tobacco over time
- Finland
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 2.2 against 2 in Finland, a difference of 0.2.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Finland ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 26th of 36 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.6 | 11.6 | 7 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 2.05 | 5.68 | 3.63 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - processed food including alcohol and excluding tobacco, Finland or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 2.2 against 2 in Finland as of 2015.
- What is the difference in hicp - processed food including alcohol and excluding tobacco between Finland and Serbia?
- 0.2, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Serbia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Finland and Serbia rank globally for hicp - processed food including alcohol and excluding tobacco?
- Finland ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 26th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Processed food including alcohol and excluding tobacco (Annual average rate of change, Eurostat). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.