Portugal vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Portugal
2.25 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
2.33 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
47th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
46th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Portugal
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M197019962023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 2.33 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.25 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 87,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 47th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 46th of 192 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 1.96 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 909,698 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.05 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 1.94 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 736,121 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 2.10 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.89 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 212,782 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Portugal or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 2.33 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.25 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Portugal and Turks and Caicos Islands?
87,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Turks and Caicos Islands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Portugal ranks 47th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 46th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/portugal/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/portugal/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Portugal vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.