Netherlands vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Netherlands
24.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
33.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Netherlands rank
10th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
7th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Netherlands
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196919962023

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 33.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 24.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 9.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.4 times Netherlands's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has been ahead every year.

Netherlands ranks 10th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 7th of 192 countries.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
2010s 21.47 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37.29 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15.82 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 22.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10.67 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Netherlands or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 33.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 24.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2021.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Netherlands and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
9.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
How do Netherlands and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Netherlands ranks 10th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 7th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Netherlands vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.