Latvia vs North Macedonia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Latvia
426,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
404,159 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
98th
North Macedonia rank
100th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Latvia
  • North Macedonia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199220072023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 426,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 404,159 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 22,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Latvia ranks 98th and North Macedonia ranks 100th of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 178,358 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 202,343 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,985 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 298,717 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 250,330 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,387 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 364,585 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 338,492 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 417,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 386,518 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Latvia or North Macedonia?
Latvia, at 426,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 404,159 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Latvia and North Macedonia?
22,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and North Macedonia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Latvia and North Macedonia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Latvia ranks 98th and North Macedonia ranks 100th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs North Macedonia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/north-macedonia/">Latvia vs North Macedonia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.