Italy vs Low income: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Italy
6.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
32,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy rank
30th
Low income rank
32nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Italy
  • Low income
02.0M4.0M6.0M197019962023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 6.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 32,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 6.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 187.9 times Low income's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Italy ranks 30th and Low income ranks 32nd of 192 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Low income Difference Ahead
1980s 4.11 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,913 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy
1990s 4.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.95 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy
2000s 5.73 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.71 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy
2010s 5.66 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.63 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy
2020s 5.86 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.83 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Italy or Low income?
Italy, at 6.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 32,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Italy and Low income?
6.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Low income?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Italy and Low income rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Italy ranks 30th and Low income ranks 32nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Low income: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/italy/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/italy/low-income/">Italy vs Low income: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.