Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Hong Kong, China
304.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
515.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Singapore rank
2nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 515.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 304.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 211.69 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.7 times Hong Kong, China's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 192 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 198.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 236.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 282.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 401.26 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 118.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 296.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 488.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 191.82 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 515.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 304.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
211.69 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.