France vs Low income: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

France
4.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
32,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
32nd
Low income rank
32nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • France
  • Low income
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

France currently reports 4.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 32,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 4.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes France's figure about 135.9 times Low income's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

France ranks 32nd and Low income ranks 32nd of 192 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Low income Difference Ahead
1980s 2.33 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,913 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre France
1990s 2.87 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.86 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre France
2000s 3.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.57 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre France
2010s 4.03 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre France
2020s 4.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, France or Low income?
France, at 4.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 32,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between France and Low income?
4.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Low income?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do France and Low income rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
France ranks 32nd and Low income ranks 32nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Low income: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/france/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/france/low-income/">France vs Low income: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.