European Union vs Macau, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

European Union
3.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
1.23 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
European Union rank
2nd
Macau, China rank
1st

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • European Union
  • Macau, China
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B197019962023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 1.23 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 3.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in European Union, a difference of 1.23 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 352.4 times European Union's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

European Union ranks 2nd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 2 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union Macau, China Difference Ahead
2000s 2.90 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.00 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 998.73 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 3.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.59 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.59 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 3.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 886.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 882.65 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, European Union or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 1.23 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 3.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in European Union as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between European Union and Macau, China?
1.23 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union and Macau, China?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do European Union and Macau, China rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
European Union ranks 2nd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union vs Macau, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/macao-sar-china/">European Union vs Macau, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.