Euro area vs Hong Kong, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Euro area
4.24 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
304.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Euro area
  • Hong Kong, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019962023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 304.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4.24 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 299.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 71.7 times Euro area's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 2 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 3.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 198.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 195.24 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 3.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 282.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 278.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 4.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 296.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 292.53 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Euro area or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 304.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4.24 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Euro area and Hong Kong, China?
299.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Hong Kong, China?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Euro area and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Euro area ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Hong Kong, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/hong-kong-sar-china/">Euro area vs Hong Kong, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.