Czechia vs Saint Lucia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Czechia
2.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Lucia
2.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
41st
Saint Lucia rank
38th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Czechia
  • Saint Lucia
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M3.0M197720002023

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 2.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 327,550 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Czechia ranks 41st and Saint Lucia ranks 38th of 192 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.38 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.90 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 526,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2000s 1.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.22 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 456,655 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2010s 2.22 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 388,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2020s 2.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,658 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Czechia or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 2.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Czechia and Saint Lucia?
327,550 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Saint Lucia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Saint Lucia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Czechia ranks 41st and Saint Lucia ranks 38th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Saint Lucia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/st-lucia/">Czechia vs Saint Lucia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.