Cuba vs New Zealand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Cuba
785,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
768,501 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
72nd
New Zealand rank
74th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • New Zealand
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 785,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 768,501 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 16,911 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 72nd and New Zealand ranks 74th of 192 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 333,131 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 243,029 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 90,102 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 454,708 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 284,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 169,767 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 383,672 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 349,963 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,709 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 541,353 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 488,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 53,314 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 801,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 613,962 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 187,299 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 786,785 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 738,438 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,347 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Cuba or New Zealand?
Cuba, at 785,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 768,501 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Cuba and New Zealand?
16,911 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Cuba ranks 72nd and New Zealand ranks 74th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Zealand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/new-zealand/">Cuba vs New Zealand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.