Cuba vs Finland: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Cuba
785,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
727,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
72nd
Finland rank
75th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Finland
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 785,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 727,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 58,027 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Cuba ranks 72nd and Finland ranks 75th of 192 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Finland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Finland Difference Ahead
1970s 276,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 267,737 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,265 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 454,708 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 373,831 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 80,877 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 383,672 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 453,567 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 69,895 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 541,353 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 636,175 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 94,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 801,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 682,453 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 118,808 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 786,785 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 720,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 66,334 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Cuba or Finland?
Cuba, at 785,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 727,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Cuba and Finland?
58,027 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Cuba ranks 72nd and Finland ranks 75th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Finland: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/finland/">Cuba vs Finland: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.