Cape Verde vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Cape Verde
448,650 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
426,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
96th
Latvia rank
98th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Latvia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199520092023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 448,650 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 426,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 21,703 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Latvia ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 96th and Latvia ranks 98th of 192 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 342,756 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 367,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 391,318 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 364,585 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,733 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 401,141 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 417,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Cape Verde or Latvia?
Cape Verde, at 448,650 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 426,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Cape Verde and Latvia?
21,703 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Latvia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Latvia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Cape Verde ranks 96th and Latvia ranks 98th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/latvia/">Cape Verde vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.