Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per
Burkina Faso
56,283 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
57,058 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
167th
Zimbabwe rank
166th
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time
- Burkina Faso
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 57,058 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 56,283 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 775 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 167th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 192 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6,386 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 22,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 15,778 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 9,366 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 29,296 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 19,930 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 13,430 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 39,946 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 26,516 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 22,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 32,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 9,902 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 39,104 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 45,216 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 6,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 53,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 52,254 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1,660 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 57,058 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 56,283 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 775 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
- Burkina Faso ranks 167th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.