Brazil vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Brazil
202,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
208,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
128th
Nepal rank
125th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Brazil
  • Nepal
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196519942023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 208,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 202,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 6,656 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 128th and Nepal ranks 125th of 192 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 56,165 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,753 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 90,146 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42,410 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 47,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 110,190 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 68,022 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 142,697 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 101,469 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 41,228 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 184,577 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 152,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,538 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 192,145 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 198,103 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,958 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Brazil or Nepal?
Nepal, at 208,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 202,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Brazil and Nepal?
6,656 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Nepal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Nepal rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Brazil ranks 128th and Nepal ranks 125th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/nepal/">Brazil vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.