Australia vs Brazil: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Australia
200,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
202,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
129th
Brazil rank
128th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Australia
  • Brazil
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 202,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 200,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 1,709 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Brazil ahead.

Australia ranks 129th and Brazil ranks 128th of 192 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Brazil Difference Ahead
1970s 48,554 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 67,658 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,104 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 60,870 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 90,146 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,276 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 84,767 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 110,190 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 121,497 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 142,697 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,200 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 162,539 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 184,577 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,038 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 190,374 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 192,145 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,771 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Australia or Brazil?
Brazil, at 202,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 200,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Australia and Brazil?
1,709 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Australia ranks 129th and Brazil ranks 128th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Brazil: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/brazil/">Australia vs Brazil: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.