Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP

Late-demographic dividend
0.9595 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
1.14 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
43rd
Rwanda rank
45th

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
00.511.5196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1.14 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9595 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1805 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 45th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0193 current US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
1970s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.11 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1014 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0.9942 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.23 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2322 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0.9905 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.28 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2848 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0.9493 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.16 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.214 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.9649 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.14 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1749 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.9629 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.16 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.197 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp, Late-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 1.14 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9595 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp between Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
0.1805 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 45th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 10,825 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.