Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Tanzania, United Republic of
92,683 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
98,345 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
150th
Zimbabwe rank
148th

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 98,345 current US$ per square kilometre against 92,683 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 5,662 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 8,651 current US$ per square kilometre 19,874 current US$ per square kilometre 11,223 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 22,366 current US$ per square kilometre 17,459 current US$ per square kilometre 4,907 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 57,288 current US$ per square kilometre 68,722 current US$ per square kilometre 11,434 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 84,575 current US$ per square kilometre 101,225 current US$ per square kilometre 16,650 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 98,345 current US$ per square kilometre against 92,683 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
5,662 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.