Malta vs OECD members: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
57.72 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
1.85 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
5th
OECD members rank
5th

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • OECD members
020.0M40.0M60.0M197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 57.72 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.85 million current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 55.87 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 31.1 times OECD members's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 5th and OECD members ranks 5th of 183 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 1.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 134,535 current US$ per square kilometre 1.60 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 4.91 million current US$ per square kilometre 331,384 current US$ per square kilometre 4.58 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 11.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 667,959 current US$ per square kilometre 10.52 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 20.48 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 19.45 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 33.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.41 million current US$ per square kilometre 32.04 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 50.73 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 49.03 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or OECD members?
Malta, at 57.72 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.85 million current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and OECD members?
55.87 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and OECD members?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and OECD members rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 5th and OECD members ranks 5th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs OECD members: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/">Malta vs OECD members: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.