Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Macau, China
843.96 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
444.87 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 843.96 million current US$ per square kilometre against 444.87 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 399.09 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.9 times Singapore's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 183 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 71.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 30.08 million current US$ per square kilometre 40.96 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 232.36 million current US$ per square kilometre 91.98 million current US$ per square kilometre 140.38 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 304.16 million current US$ per square kilometre 148.13 million current US$ per square kilometre 156.03 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 745.88 million current US$ per square kilometre 326.43 million current US$ per square kilometre 419.45 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 796.76 million current US$ per square kilometre 396.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 400.02 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Macau, China or Singapore?
Macau, China, at 843.96 million current US$ per square kilometre against 444.87 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Macau, China and Singapore?
399.09 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.