Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Guinea
98,090 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
92,683 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
149th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
150th

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k198620042023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 98,090 current US$ per square kilometre against 92,683 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 5,407 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 149th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 150th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 14,055 current US$ per square kilometre 8,651 current US$ per square kilometre 5,404 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2000s 19,859 current US$ per square kilometre 22,366 current US$ per square kilometre 2,508 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 44,836 current US$ per square kilometre 57,288 current US$ per square kilometre 12,452 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 80,762 current US$ per square kilometre 84,575 current US$ per square kilometre 3,813 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Guinea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Guinea, at 98,090 current US$ per square kilometre against 92,683 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
5,407 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guinea ranks 149th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 150th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/tanzania/">Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.