Guatemala vs India: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
1.12 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
1.20 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
65th
India rank
62nd

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • India
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 1.20 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.12 million current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 76,280 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

Guatemala ranks 65th and India ranks 62nd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and India in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala India Difference Ahead
1960s 12,944 current US$ per square kilometre 18,648 current US$ per square kilometre 5,704 current US$ per square kilometre India
1970s 36,735 current US$ per square kilometre 36,311 current US$ per square kilometre 424.53 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 81,017 current US$ per square kilometre 86,510 current US$ per square kilometre 5,493 current US$ per square kilometre India
1990s 137,149 current US$ per square kilometre 121,691 current US$ per square kilometre 15,458 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 290,390 current US$ per square kilometre 294,193 current US$ per square kilometre 3,803 current US$ per square kilometre India
2010s 619,331 current US$ per square kilometre 752,950 current US$ per square kilometre 133,619 current US$ per square kilometre India
2020s 966,595 current US$ per square kilometre 1.08 million current US$ per square kilometre 117,289 current US$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or India?
India, at 1.20 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.12 million current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and India?
76,280 current US$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and India rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 65th and India ranks 62nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs India: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/india/">Guatemala vs India: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.