Euro area vs Macau, China: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Euro area
5.42 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
843.96 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
1st
Macau, China rank
1st

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Euro area
  • Macau, China
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B197019962023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 843.96 million current US$ per square kilometre against 5.42 million current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 838.53 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 155.6 times Euro area's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 1st and Macau, China ranks 1st of 43 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 1.34 million current US$ per square kilometre 71.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 69.70 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 2.46 million current US$ per square kilometre 232.36 million current US$ per square kilometre 229.90 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre 304.16 million current US$ per square kilometre 300.62 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 4.47 million current US$ per square kilometre 745.88 million current US$ per square kilometre 741.41 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 5.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 796.76 million current US$ per square kilometre 791.74 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Euro area or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 843.96 million current US$ per square kilometre against 5.42 million current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Euro area and Macau, China?
838.53 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Macau, China?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Euro area and Macau, China rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Euro area ranks 1st and Macau, China ranks 1st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Macau, China: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/macao-sar-china/">Euro area vs Macau, China: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.