Czechia vs Pacific island small states: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Czechia
4.25 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pacific island small states
218,801 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
32nd
Pacific island small states rank
32nd

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Czechia
  • Pacific island small states
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M198020012023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 4.25 million current US$ per square kilometre against 218,801 current US$ per square kilometre in Pacific island small states, a difference of 4.03 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 19.4 times Pacific island small states's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 32nd and Pacific island small states ranks 32nd of 183 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Pacific island small states Difference Ahead
1990s 777,374 current US$ per square kilometre 63,361 current US$ per square kilometre 714,013 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 1.73 million current US$ per square kilometre 91,721 current US$ per square kilometre 1.64 million current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 2.68 million current US$ per square kilometre 164,168 current US$ per square kilometre 2.52 million current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 3.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 199,858 current US$ per square kilometre 3.50 million current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Czechia or Pacific island small states?
Czechia, at 4.25 million current US$ per square kilometre against 218,801 current US$ per square kilometre in Pacific island small states as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Czechia and Pacific island small states?
4.03 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Pacific island small states?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Pacific island small states rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Czechia ranks 32nd and Pacific island small states ranks 32nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Pacific island small states: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/pacific-island-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/pacific-island-small-states/">Czechia vs Pacific island small states: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.