Curaçao vs Lower middle income: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Curaçao
8.84 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Lower middle income
381,698 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curaçao rank
22nd
Lower middle income rank
24th
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Curaçao
- Lower middle income
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 8.84 million current US$ per square kilometre against 381,698 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 8.45 million current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Curaçao's figure about 23.1 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Curaçao has been ahead every year.
Curaçao ranks 22nd and Lower middle income ranks 24th of 183 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Curaçao or Lower middle income?
- Curaçao, at 8.84 million current US$ per square kilometre against 381,698 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Curaçao and Lower middle income?
- 8.45 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Lower middle income?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Curaçao and Lower middle income rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
- Curaçao ranks 22nd and Lower middle income ranks 24th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.